More than 38 million Americans live with diabetes, making it the 7th leading cause of death in 2023. It remains the top cause of kidney failure, amputations, and adult blindness. Roughly 1 in 4 US health-care dollars is spent caring for people with diabetes.
Managing this disease takes more than willpower. It requires medication, lifestyle adjustments, and consistent monitoring. Newer long-acting insulins like Toujeo and Tresiba have become essential medications for people working to keep blood sugar under control.
This guide breaks down the differences between Toujeo and Tresiba, explaining how they work, how effective they are, their side effects, and what factors matter when choosing between them.
Effectiveness and Safety
Across randomized trials, including head-to-head and real-world studies, Toujeo and Tresiba deliver very similar glycemic efficacy.
In some settings, Toujeo tends to show fewer early titration lows, while Tresiba provides slightly lower fasting glucose and fewer nocturnal or severe hypoglycemia events. Overall, A1C reduction is essentially the same, and the differences are small and depend on the setting.
Tresiba vs. Toujeo for Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)
There aren’t direct head-to-head trials of Toujeo vs. Tresiba in children, but both have strong pediatric data:
Toujeo (EDITION JUNIOR trial, ages 6-17, vs. Lantus U100):
Tresiba (BEGIN YOUNG trial, ages 1-17, vs. Levemir):
So, both are safe and effective in kids with T1D, but Tresiba may reduce ketosis more.
On the other hand, a few studies have compared Toujeo and Tresiba directly in adults with type 1 diabetes:
Both control glucose equally well. Toujeo has real-world evidence of fewer severe lows, while Tresiba may push glucose a bit lower (fewer highs, but sometimes more lows).
Tresiba vs. Toujeo for Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Similarly, both insulins are highly effective for T2D.
Head-to-head trial (24 weeks, T2D who have never used insulin before)
In about 930 adults with uncontrolled T2D starting basal insulin, both Toujeo and Tresiba lowered A1C from 8.7% to 7.0%. During the first 12 weeks of titration, Toujeo caused fewer hypoglycemia events. By week 24, hypoglycemia rates were similar between the two insulins.
Long-term safety trial (88 weeks, high-risk T2D)
In 1,600 adults already on basal insulin and at increased risk for hypoglycemia, both Toujeo and Tresiba controlled blood sugar equally well. However, Tresiba reduced night-time lows by 37% and severe lows by 80% compared with Toujeo, making it potentially safer in patients more vulnerable to dangerous lows.
Real-world switching study (from Lantus U100 or Levemir to Toujeo or Tresiba)
Among 3,184 adults switching from older basal insulins, A1C improvement was similar with Toujeo and Tresiba.
-
- Toujeo patients saw fewer overall hypoglycemia events, from 15.6% down to 12.7%
- ER/hospital hypoglycemia visits dropped from 5.3% to 3.5%
- Tresiba patients did not show a significant change
Overall, both insulins are highly effective for patients with T2D, but Tresiba may provide strong protection against night-time and severe hypoglycemia in high-risk patients.
Duration of Action of Toujeo and Tresiba

At a dose of 0.4 units/kg, Toujeo lasts about 24 hours. At 0.6 units/kg or higher, its action can last even longer, up to 36 hours. Steady state takes about 5 days of daily use for blood levels to stabilize.
On the other hand, Tresiba is unique because it provides ultra-long, steady coverage. Both U-100 and U-200 Tresiba last at least 42 hours. It takes only about 2-3 days of daily use to reach steady state.
Researchers actually examined whether Toujeo and Tresiba U100, when titrated to each person’s needs, would work about the same in people with T1D. Patients first optimized their insulin doses for 3 months, then received their individualized daily doses of either Toujeo (~0.34 U/kg) or Tresiba (~0.26 U/kg) at night.
Results are as follows:
In short, Toujeo is slightly steadier, Tresiba requires less insulin, and both are equally effective for blood sugar control.
Side Effects of Tresiba vs. Toujeo
The side-effect profiles of Toujeo and Tresiba are very similar because they belong to the same class of long-acting basal insulins. According to their prescribing information, the most common side effects include:
-
- Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar)
- Allergic reactions
- Injection site reactions
- Lipodystrophy (changes in fat tissue under the skin, such as lumps or dents)
- Pruritus (itching)
- Rash
- Edema (swelling)
- Weight gain
Hypoglycemia
Hypoglycemia is the main risk with both insulins, and overall rates are similar.
-
- Toujeo: Fewer hypoglycemia events during the early titration phase in one trial.
- Tresiba: Fewer nighttime and severe episodes in another study.
These differences were small and may depend on factors like dose timing, lifestyle, and individual hypoglycemia history.
Hypoglycemia often starts with shakiness, sweating, hunger, and rapid heartbeat, and can progress to confusion, blurred vision, poor coordination, and, if untreated, seizures or unconsciousness.
Weight Changes
If weight gain is a concern, evidence suggests that the two insulins may differ slightly. In the CONCLUDE trial, which followed patients for 88 weeks, those using Tresiba U200 gained an average of 2.9 kg (about 6.4 lbs). In comparison, patients on Toujeo gained an average of 1.7 kg (about 3.7 lbs) over the same period.
Another analysis looked at people who switched from Tresiba U100 to Toujeo. In this group, the switch was associated with a small weight loss of about 3 lbs.
While these changes are relatively small, the data suggest that Toujeo may be associated with less weight gain, or even slight weight reduction in some cases, compared with Tresiba.
Dosing and Administration
Toujeo and Tresiba look almost identical in how they’re prescribed because both drugs serve the same basal insulin role. Both are once-daily basal insulins, started at similar doses, and titrated in nearly the same way.
The only difference in administration is that Tresiba can be taken at different times of day without losing effectiveness, as long as you keep at least 8 hours between doses.
For example, if you normally take it at 9 PM but forget, you could take it at 7 AM the next morning and then return to your regular schedule the following evening. As long as you maintain that 8-hour minimum gap, you won’t lose effectiveness. This flexibility is especially useful for people with irregular schedules.
| Toujeo | Tresiba | |
|---|---|---|
| Strength | 300 units per mL | 100 units per mL and 200 units per mL |
| Forms |
|
|
| Frequency | Once per day, same time each day | Once per day, flexible time |
| Dosage for type 1 diabetes (starting dose) | Approximately one-third to one-half of the total daily insulin dose. | Approximately one-third to one-half of the total daily insulin dose. |
| Dosage for type 2 diabetes (starting dose) | 0.2 units/kg, up to 10 units per day | 0.2 units/kg, up to 10 units per day |
Cost of Toujeo vs. Tresiba
The prices below show the manufacturer costs of Toujeo and Tresiba. In most cases, pharmacy retail prices are higher and will vary depending on your location, pharmacy, and insurance coverage.
Tresiba (insulin degludec), according to Novo Nordisk’s pricing:
Toujeo (insulin glargine U-300), according to Sanofi’s pricing:
You can access Toujeo and Tresiba at much lower prices through Pharma Giant, a trusted Canadian pharmacy partner. Thanks to Canada’s strict drug pricing regulations, you can save up to 90% compared with US retail costs.
Current Pharma Giant prices:
Plus, you can enjoy additional discounts when ordering larger quantities and offers from Toujeo coupons and Tresiba coupons. To save more, use the coupon code PGSAVE10 for a 10% discount on your first order. Pharma Giant promises expedited delivery, with medications typically arriving within 3-5 business days.
Summary
Toujeo and Tresiba are both highly effective long-acting basal insulins. Tresiba lasts over 42 hours and allows flexible dosing times, while Toujeo lasts up to 36 hours and may provide slightly steadier daily control. Side effects are similar, though Toujeo may cause less weight gain than Tresiba.
Both are strong options, which means the choice between them can reasonably hinge on other factors like personal preference, cost, insurance coverage, or pen features, rather than expecting a big difference in day-to-day glucose profiles from one versus the other.
Related Articles
Frequently Asked Questions
Sources
Parker, E. D., Lin, J., Mahoney, T., Ume, N., Yang, G., Gabbay, R. A., ElSayed, N. A., & Bannuru, R. R. (2023). Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2022. Diabetes Care, 47(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci23-0085
Murphy, S. L., Kochanek, K. D., Xu, J., & Arias, E. (2024). Mortality in the United States, 2023. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/170564
Type 2 diabetes. (2024, May 15). Diabetes. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/about/about-type-2-diabetes.html
Danne, T., Tamborlane, W. V., Malievsky, O. A., Franco, D. R., Kawamura, T., Demissie, M., Niemoeller, E., Goyeau, H., Wardecki, M., & Battelino, T. (2020). Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL (Gla-300) Versus Insulin Glargine 100 Units/mL (Gla-100) in Children and Adolescents (6–17 years) With Type 1 Diabetes: Results of the EDITION JUNIOR Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care, 43(7), 1512–1519. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-1926
Thalange, N., Deeb, L., Iotova, V., Kawamura, T., Klingensmith, G., Philotheou, A., Silverstein, J., Tumini, S., Francisco, A. O., Kinduryte, O., & Danne, T. (2015). Insulin degludec in combination with bolus insulin aspart is safe and effective in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatric Diabetes, 16(3), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12263
Battelino, T., Danne, T., Edelman, S. V., Choudhary, P., Renard, E., Westerbacka, J., Mukherjee, B., Pilorget, V., Coudert, M., & Bergenstal, R. M. (2022). Continuous glucose monitoring?based time?in?range using insulin glargine 300 units/ml versus insulin degludec 100 units/ml in type 1 diabetes: The head?to?head randomized controlled InRange trial. Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, 25(2), 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14898
Laviola, L., Porcellati, F., Bruttomesso, D., Larosa, M., Rossi, M. C., & Nicolucci, A. (2020). Comparative Effectiveness of Switching From First-Generation Basal Insulin to Glargine 300 U/ml or Degludec 100 U/ml in Type 1 Diabetes: The RESTORE-1 Study. Diabetes Therapy, 12(2), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00982-z
Miura, H., Sakaguchi, K., Otowa?Suematsu, N., Yamada, T., So, A., Komada, H., Okada, Y., Hirota, Y., Tamori, Y., & Ogawa, W. (2020). Effects of insulin degludec and insulin glargine U300 on glycaemic stability in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A multicentre, randomized controlled crossover study. Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, 22(12), 2356–2363. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14161
Rosenstock, J., Cheng, A., Ritzel, R., Bosnyak, Z., Devisme, C., Cali, A. M., Sieber, J., Stella, P., Wang, X., Frías, J. P., Roussel, R., & Bolli, G. B. (2018). More similarities than differences Testing insulin glargine 300 Units/mL versus insulin degludec 100 Units/mL in Insulin-Naive Type 2 diabetes: the Randomized Head-to-Head BRIGHT Trial. Diabetes Care, 41(10), 2147–2154. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-0559
Philis-Tsimikas, A., Klonoff, D. C., Khunti, K., Bajaj, H. S., Leiter, L. A., Hansen, M. V., Troelsen, L. N., Ladelund, S., Heller, S., & Pieber, T. R. (2020). Risk of hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U300 in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, head-to-head CONCLUDE trial. Diabetologia, 63(4), 698–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-05080-9
Sullivan, S. D., Bailey, T. S., Roussel, R., Zhou, F. L., Bosnyak, Z., Preblick, R., Westerbacka, J., Gupta, R. A., & Blonde, L. (2018). Clinical outcomes in real-world patients with type 2 diabetes switching from first- to second-generation basal insulin analogues: Comparative effectiveness of insulin glargine 300 units/mL and insulin degludec in the DELIVER D+ cohort study. Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, 20(9), 2148–2158. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13345
Gonzalvo, J. D., Patel, D. K., & Olin, J. L. (2017). Concentrated Insulins: A Review and Recommendations. Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 34(Suppl 8), S38–S43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30766315/
Lucidi, P., Candeloro, P., Cioli, P., Andreoli, A. M., Pascucci, C., Gambelunghe, A., Bolli, G. B., Fanelli, C. G., & Porcellati, F. (2020). Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Head-to-Head Comparison of Clinical, Equivalent Doses of Insulin Glargine 300 units · mL?1 and Insulin Degludec 100 units · mL?1 in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 44(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1033
Ragonese, M., Larosa, M., Angotti, S., Annese, S., Cruciani, L., Dainelli, M., Lucisano, G., Prosperini, G., Sacco, M., Salomone, E., Saponara, C., Semprini, R., Rossi, M. C., & Nicolucci, A. (2020). Clinical Outcomes of Switching to Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml from Other Basal Insulins in People with Type 2 Diabetes in Italy: A Real-World Study. Diabetes Therapy, 11(10), 2283–2298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00902-1
Sprio, E., Lucotti, P., Iadarola, C., Bellingeri, C., Beneventi, F., & Lovati, E. (2020). Use of insulin degludec in pregnancy: two case reports and a literature review. Endocrine and Metabolic Science, 1(3–4), 100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endmts.2020.100064








